Swiggy vs Zomato: How Swiggy stacks up against rival Zomato in food delivery and quick commerce

SUMMARY

Zomato leads Swiggy in key metrics, including GOV, AOV, and profitability. While Swiggy has improved revenue and reduced expenses, Zomato’s stronger market position, positive contribution margin, and larger user base give it a competitive edge.

Swiggy vs Zomato: How Swiggy stacks up against rival Zomato in food delivery and quick commerce

India’s second-largest food delivery and quick commerce company is set to launch its Initial Public Offering (IPO) in November 2024. The total issue size is to be ₹11,327 crore, comprising a fresh issue of ₹4,499 crore and an offer for sale of ₹6,828 crore. The IPO will open for subscription from November 6 to November 8, 2024.

Swiggy provides its users with an easy-to-use platform that they can access via a single app to search, select, order, and pay for food (Food Delivery), grocery and household goods (Instamart) and have orders delivered to their homes via an on-demand delivery partner network.

Industry Overview

The Indian food services market, which includes both online food delivery and out-of-home consumption, was valued at ₹5,60,000 crore (US$70 billion) as of 2023. The online food delivery segment alone will show an impressive projected compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 17–22% until 2028. Additionally, the online dining segment is expected to grow significantly, with a 46–53% increase anticipated from 2023 to 2024.

India’s retail market stood at approximately ₹7,60,000 to ₹7,80,000 crore in 2023, with grocery sales making up 61% of this share. This sector has seen substantial disruption due to the rise of quick commerce platforms like Blinkit(Zomato), Swiggy Instamart, Zepto, etc.

The industry recorded between 0.8–0.85 crore Annual Transacting Users (ATUs) in 2023, with a considerable 25–29% of these users being Monthly Transacting Users (MTUs). This proportion is projected to increase to 27–32% by 2028. The Average Order Value (AOV)—defined as the average value of a single order, pre-discount and including taxes and customer delivery charges but excluding tips—has also risen from around ₹290–320 (US$3.6–4.0) in 2018 to approximately ₹425 (US$5.3) in 2023.

Let's compare two major players: Swiggy v/s Zomato

Financials Metrics of Swiggy v/s Zomato

At the upper end of its reported price band for Swiggy is at ₹390, Zomato’s market capitalization is approximately 2.5 times that of Swiggy. After several quarters as a loss-making company, Zomato has recently shifted into a positive financial trajectory, while Swiggy continues to face challenges.

In FY2024, Swiggy’s revenue grew by 34%, and its net profit margin improved to -20%, a significant recovery from -60% in 2022. This reflects Swiggy’s ongoing efforts to improve its financial performance.

The company has also significantly reduced expenses, reducing its technology and cloud infrastructure costs to 2.54%, advertising and sales promotion expenses to 15.91%, and employee benefit expenses to 17.30%, all nearly half of their 2022 levels.

Let's compare Swiggy and Zomato on the Quick Commerce segment: Q1FY25

The Quick Commerce Platform for Zomato is Blinkit, and for Swiggy it is Swiggy Instamart

Gross Order Value (GOV):

Zomato leads with a GOV of ₹4,923 crore, significantly higher than Swiggy’s ₹2,724 crore. This indicates a higher transaction volume or value per transaction for Zomato than Swiggy.

Average Order Value (AOV):

Zomato’s AOV is ₹625, whereas Swiggy’s is lower at ₹487. This suggests that Zomato’s customers tend to place higher-value orders on average.

Average Monthly Transacting Users:

Zomato also has a higher Average Monthly Transacting Users at 0.76 crore (7.6 million), compared to Swiggy’s 0.52 crore (5.2 million). Zomato’s larger user base could contribute to its higher GOV and AOV.

Active Dark Stores:

Zomato operates 639 active dark stores, slightly more than Swiggy’s 557. More dark stores could mean better logistical coverage and possibly faster delivery, giving Zomato an edge in customer experience.

Contribution Margin:

Zomato shows a positive contribution margin of 4%, indicating profitability at the unit level. Swiggy, on the other hand, has a negative contribution margin of -3.18%, suggesting it incurs a loss per transaction on average. Zomato’s positive margin suggests better cost efficiency.

Overall, Zomato outperforms Swiggy in all key metrics, including GOV, AOV, monthly transacting users, and contribution margin. This indicates stronger financial health and operational efficiency for Zomato relative to Swiggy.

Know More: Swiggy vs Zomato: Analyzing Q2FY25 financial and operational performance

*Swiggy vs Zomato

Disclaimer:

This article is only for educational purposes. We do not recommend any particular stock, securities and strategies for trading. The securities quoted are exemplary and are not recommendatory. The stock names mentioned in this article are purely for showing how to do analysis. Take your own decision before trading and investing.